Sexuality 2.0

sexuality 2.0

An example of how sexuality could be defined with increased accuracy.

“What I feel we have arrived at with all this, is that queerness – as I am happy to call an all-embracing, foundational tenet – is really a state of mind brought about by an understanding: it is understanding difference, accepting your own truth, desire and identity, and lovely, lovely choice. It is the final, completely obvious contemporary acceptance and understanding that this enormous world of beauty, sexuality, identity, lust, feeling, excitement, and love isn’t just black and white, or simple, at all – it is literally every shade and gradation of the rainbow. It doesn’t just lie in one of two camps. It includes accepting and supporting positions that you may not even completely understand.”

– Michael Stipe

Questions to Consider

  • TWE is sexuality adequately defined by current standard sexual terminology?
  • If lesbian sex acts arouse the heterosexual attentions of a male, should it be classed as a strictly homosexual act? Reasons?
  • Does one access a sexually neutral state during moments of zen, enlightenment or meditation? If so, what does this say about sexually neutral states in general?

  

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s